Archive for March, 2009

SUICIDE CLAUSE in Life Insurance Law. Important Legal Guide to Life Insurance.

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

SUICIDE CLAUSE
Suicide is the intentional killing of oneself. A typical policy will provide that:
If the insured commits suicide, while sane or insane, within two years from the Policy Date, our liability will be limited to the amount of the premiums
paid, less any debt and partial surrenders, and less the costs of any riders.
If the insured commits suicide, while sane or insane, within two years from the effective date(s) of any increase in insurance or any reinstatement, our
total liability shall be the cost of the increase or reinstatement.
The insurer is stating that the promised death benefit will not be paid if the insured dies as the result of a suicide within the specified period of (usually) two years.

Like the incontestable provision, the suicide clause provides a legitimate balance between the interests of the parties:
    Insurer – The insurer is responsible to other policyowners (in a mutual company) or to shareholders (in a stock company) for matching premium charges with risk. If individuals contemplating suicide were allowed to purchase life insurance without restriction, the insurer’s increased and accelerated liability would be reflected in higher costs that eventually would be passed on to policyowners (or shareholders). The mere knowledge that suicide within two years would not accomplish the intended goal of enriching beneficiaries at the insurer’s expense is thought to discourage those who would take a policy out with the specific intent of committing suicide. The imposition of what amounts to a relatively short “waiting period” for full coverage substantially reduces the threat of unfair additional costs levied upon other policyowners.
    Policyowner and beneficiaries – The policyowner and his or her beneficiaries need the insurance regardless of the cause of the insured’s death and should not have to bear the expense, aggravation, and uncertainty of litigation if suicide—no matter how long after the contract was purchased—would cause a loss of the proceeds the contract was designed to furnish. Regardless of whether the insured was sane or insane, once the suicide period expires, the insurer is liable at the death of the insured.




Most cases dealing with the suicide clause are concerned with one (or both) of two issues:
1.    Was the cause of death suicide or some outside force? (Was the insured murdered?)
2.    Assuming the insured killed himself, did he or did he not intend to do so? (Was the death accidental rather than intentional?)

The presumption is that the insured did not commit suicide and the insurer must prove that the facts reasonably demonstrate death did not occur by accident.

This burden of proof shifts, however, in the case of accidental death riders. There, the beneficiary must prove that the insured died accidentally and not by self destruction.

Absent a suicide provision, if the insured dies as a result of suicide, in most cases the insurer will be required to pay no matter how soon death occurs
after the policy is issued—unless the insurer can prove that the insured purchased the policy with the deliberate intent of killing himself and enriching his beneficiaries at the expense of the insurer by that fraud (the implicit agreement that when a policy is purchased the insured is not intending to do himself in).

Because a suicide is by definition a deliberate act, it will mean the insurer is not liable to pay any accidental death benefits. “A suicide is not an accidental death.”




When the clock starts to tick on the (typically two year) suicide exclusion time period varies depending upon the following:
    Policy backdated to “save age” – Most courts will start the time at the “issue date” if it is clearly stated in the policy. But, if the terms of the contract are ambiguous, the time may start at the backdate rather than the issue date.
    Conversion of term to permanent – Assuming the new policy is obtained through an individual term or group option to convert, many courts will treat the transaction as a continuance of the original contract. This means if the original individual term or group term life was covered by a suicide clause, it continues (and the clock ticks) from the original date. If there was no suicide clause in the original, the new policy would not carry one.

After the suicide period has expired, the insurer is liable for paying the death proceeds regardless of the cause of death.

Did you like this? Share it:

Engage the Hearts and the Minds of your employees to achieve Passionate Performance that last.

Friday, March 27th, 2009

When their basic human needs are fulfilled, you can achieve full engagement with a simple but powerful formula: When my needs are fulfilled, I am engaged and I perform at my peak ability.

When employees’ needs are met, they will be motivated to help those who meet their needs. When their needs are not met, they become frustrated, out of control, unfocused, and disconnected—in a word, disengaged.
To become a more engaging leader, make it a priority to get to know your employees. By knowing who they are, as people, you can better fulfill their needs to keep them fully engaged. If you can see your employees as people, you can identify six basic needs—three emotional and three intellectual are listed here.

Six Basic Needs of Employees
Intellectual (Mind) Needs
Achievement
Intimacy
Mastery

Emotional (Heart) Needs
Purpose
Autonomy
Appreciation

As you study these needs, you’ll see that they are interdependent. For example, to engage the hearts of your employees, you’ll need to fulfill all three of the emotional needs. And the same is true to engage their minds; you’ll need to fulfill all of their intellectual needs.
Engaged minds build employee performance, and engaged hearts ignite employees’ passion.
Therefore, achieving Passionate Performance is a two-sided challenge: emotional and intellectual. To be successful, you must be able to engage the hearts and the minds of your employees.
Performance without passion tends to falter during tough times or in the face of challenges that require sacrifice, significant extra effort, or unusually creative solutions. Conversely, passion without performance results in watered-down and unfocused efforts.

Did you like this? Share it:

How to Differentiate your Brand in Commodity Markets. Create Unique Selling Proposition that differentiate your Brand in Marketplace.

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

Differentiating Commodities
Even the world of meats and produce has found ways to differentiate itself and thus create that unique selling proposition. Their successful strategies can be summed up in five ways:
1.    Identify. Ordinary bananas became better bananas by adding a Chiquita label to the fruit. Dole did the same for pineapple with the Dole label, as did the lettuce people by putting each head into a clear package. Of course, you then have to communicate why people should look for these labels.
2.    Personify. The Green Giant character became the difference in a family of vegetables in many forms. Frank Perdue became the tough man behind the tender chicken.
3.    Create a new generic. The cantaloupe people wanted to differentiate a special, big cantaloupe. But rather than call them just plain ‘‘big,’’ they introduced a new category called Crenshaw melons. Tyson wanted to sell miniature chickens, which doesn’t sound very appetizing. So they introduced Cornish game hens.
4.    Change the name. Sometimes your original name doesn’t sound like it would be something you would want to put in your mouth. Like a Chinese gooseberry. By changing it to kiwi, the world suddenly had a new favorite fruit.
5.    Reposition the category. Pork was just pig for many years. All that did was conjure up mental pictures of little animals wallowing in the mud. Then they jumped on the chicken bandwagon and became ‘‘the other white meat.’’ A very good move when red meat became a perceptual problem.

Did you like this? Share it: